Months ago you may have heard of a tax on botox in the news stories covering the new health care bill. They had inserted a 5% tax on botox and other cosmetic procedures which received quite a bit of backlash. In the weeks after this "botax" as it was referred to, doctors and industry groups lobbied against the tax arguing in part that it discriminated against women, who receive the majority of cosmetic surgery and anti
-aging injections. The site Stopcosmetictax.org, financed in part by Allergan, which makes Botox, stated that “it is unfair and insulting” to impose a penalty on cosmetic procedures sought primarily by women as if the procedures were unhealthy, like smoking.
Dr. David M. Pariser, the president of the American Academy of Dermatology, said his association proposed that an indoor-tanning tax be considered in place of the cosmetic tax, and that it contacted the offices of senators. “We made the case this will reduce health care costs by hopefully reducing skin cancer in the future — that’s the point — and also raise a little revenue now,” Dr. Pariser said.
The 10 percent tax on indoor tanning services will raise $2.7 billion over 10 years which is designed to offset some of the expense of providing health insurance for millions more Americans.
What do you think? Are you for or against this tax on indoor tanning? Leave a comment about these changes to Kentucky health insurance to let us know what you think.